Dutch
Elm Disease (DED)
David L. Roberts, Ph.D.
Michigan State University Extension
Dutch Elm Disease
(DED), caused by the fungus Ophiostoma ulmi (Buism.)
Nannf., O. novoulmi Brasier (formerly Ceratocystis
ulmi), is a serious threat to American Elms around the United States.
It has essentially eliminated most of American Elms from the U.S. The disease
was first introduced to the Americas in the 1930's from Europe, on elm
logs of all things! Why we were importing logs at that time is beyond my
comprehension.
Over the past couple of years DED has been quite
prevalent in many areas of Michigan. In fact, the disease has taken a sudden
upward turn in incidence and I think this increase is probably due to stressed
trees, especially drought stress, and a potentially higher chance of insect
transmission during stress conditions. This year (summer of 2000) is shaping
up to be the worst year for loss of elms to DED than any year I can remember.
There is still a rather significant population of elms in Michigan and
in some locations, for example the Grosse Point area, Ulmus Americana
comprises the major component of the urban forest; these trees are quite
valuable to the residents. While we have a significant elm population on
the MSU campus, the incidence of DED has reached an alarming rate compared
to previous periods, despite the valiant efforts of the grounds department.
The fungus grows through the vascular system of
the tree and prevents water movement to branches and leaves. Hence, DED
is actually a wilt disease. The fungus is spread from tree to tree by elm
bark beetles and through root grafts. Control or management of the disease is by a multiple endeavor
approach.
Here is a list of
some techniques that will help minimize DED and perhaps help
us to
better ward-off the disease. Some of them can be quite costly, so implementation
of these efforts will depend on a variety of issues with cost being a primary
consideration and feasibility being a secondary one.
Minimize Stress
I don't think there's any question that stressed
trees are more likely to attract the insect vectors and hence the disease.
Deep-root watering during dry periods may help. Moderate fertilization
may also help but keep in mind that fertilization, especially abundant
amounts, may also stress trees further.
Trenching
In addition to transmission by elm bark beetles,
the DED fungus is spread through root grafts between trees. Trenching
is a viable technique to sever these roots and minimize spread through
these root unions. Trenching may have to be accomplished or designed into
tiers as primary and secondary efforts. Trenching is usually performed
mid-way between trees but may be difficult in some dense stands.
Eliminate Weedy Elms
In many areas such as wood lots and property borders,
elms grow naturally to about 20-30 feet, contract DED and die. These weedy
elms serve as a great source of elm bark beetles and the DED fungus. These
populations of insects and fungal propagules create a great disease pressure
for nearby grand old elms. Remember, any large, old elms are simply escapes
and are not resistant to the disease.
Avoid Pruning & Wounds
Although not said, there is no reason why the DED
fungus cannot be spread by means other than elm bark beetles and root grafts.
For example, sap beetles can spread oak wilt and could potentially spread
DED as well. I believe pruning wounds created during the warm season greatly
increase the chances of DED. We know that slime flux bacteria (the cause
of the stain on most elm trunks) are contracted by elms in such a manner.
Presumably, the fermentation products emitting from the wounds with slime
flux bacteria could attract insect vectors.
Injection
There are several micro and macro injection techniques
and products on the market. These products can be used in a preventative
and curative manner. Some offer three-year rates and one-year rates. Some
researchers and arborists have related better results with higher inject
rates, higher injection volumes and higher number of injection sites (by
exposure of the root flares). I suspect that this is true because the main
impediment to success of the chemical in controlling the fungus is limitations
in distribution of the chemical through the tree. Some have found success
with injection even though 10-30 percent of the tree may be infected. Obviously,
the less infection, the
better the chances of success by injections. |